MULTI-GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTION OF COERCIVE POWER IN THE WORKPLACE: SENIOR EXECUTIVE COERCIVE POWER
The purpose of this research study was to investigate the perception of coercive power between Generation X born between 1965 and 1980, and Generation Y born between 1981 and 2000, within an organizationΓÇÖs workplace environment, to determine whether differences existed in their perception of coercive power - Senior Executive┬áCoercive Power: Participants perceive senior executives use coercive power more than supervisors to motivate performance.
Adams, S. J. (2000). Generation X: How understanding the population leads to better safety programs. Professional Safety, 45(1), 26-29.
Adler, H. (2007). Key leader characteristics. Leadership Excellence, 5, 5.
Barford, I. & Hester, P. (2011). ANALYSIS OF Generation Y Workforce Motivation Using Multiattribute Utility Theory, A Publication of the Defense Acquisition University.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and StogdillΓÇÖs handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Calhoun, G., Griffith, J., & Sinioris, M. (2007). The foundation of leadership in Baldridge winning organizations. Modern Healthcare, 37, 9ΓÇô20.
Daboval, J. M. (1998). A comparison between Baby Boomer and Generation X employeesΓÇÖ bases and foci of commitment (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 9823312).
Eisner, S. P. (2005). Managing Generation Y. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 70(4), 4-15.
Firestone, R., Dr. (2009, April 12). Personal Power. Psychology Today website: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-experience/200904/personal-power
Harvey, M. (2002). The hidden force: A critique of normative approaches to business leadership. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 66(4), 36.
researcherΓÇÖs companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hultman, K. (2006). Leadership as genuine giving. Organization Development Journal, 24(1), 41ΓÇô56. Retrieved July 27, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.
Janiszewski, R. D. (2004). Motivational factors that influence Baby Boomers.
Jeffries, F. L., & Hunte, T. L. (2004). Generations and motivation: A connection worth making. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 6(1), 37-70.
Joseph, J. (2003). National Business Ethics Survey 2003: How employees view ethics in their organizations. Washington, DC: Ethics Resource Center.
Karp, H., Sirias, D., & Arnold, K. (1999). Teams: Why Generation X marks the spot. Journal for Quality & Participation, 22(4), 30-33
Keith, K. M. (2008). The case for servant leadership. Westfield, IN: Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
Kennedy, C. (2006). In favour of execution. Director, 59(12), 20.
Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65-76.
Latham, G. P. (2007). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 857- 861. doi:10.1108/02683940810904358
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maslow, A. (2008). A theory of human motivation. In J. S. Ott, S. J. Parkes, & R. B. Simpson, Classic readings in organizational behavior (4th ed., pp. 148-156). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. (Original work published in 1943)
McCall, J. J. (2002). Leadership and ethics: Corporate accountability to whom, for what, and by what means? Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1/2), 133ΓÇô140. Merritt, J. (2004). Welcome to ethics. Business Week, 3904, 90.
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1999). The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(1), 45ΓÇô60.
OΓÇÖBannon, G. (2001). Managing our future: The Generation X factor. Public Personnel Management, 30(1), 95-109.
OΓÇÖConnor, D., & Yballe, L. (2007). Maslow revisited: Constructing a road map of human nature. Journal of Management Education, 31(6), 738-756. doi:10.1177/1052562907307639
Peterson, R., Smith, D., & Martorana, P. (2006). Choosing between a rock and a hard place when data are scarce and the questions important:
Reply to Hollenbeck, DeRue, and Mannor (2006). Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 6ΓÇô8.
Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Pinchot, G., & Pinchot, E. (1993). The end of bureaucracy and the rise of the intelligent organization. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Quinine, T. (2007). Spiritual leadership within the service industry: A phenomenological study interpreting the spiritual leadership experiences of eight business executives. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68 (04). (UMI No. 3264282)
Rahim, M. Afzalur; Antonioni, David; Psenicka, Clement. International Journal of Conflict Management. 2001, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p191. 21p
Reid, M. (2013, February 12). How to cultivate a positive, productive workplace
culture. Retrieved May 28, 2016, from New Hope Network website:
Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture & leadership. Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://www.tnellen.com/ted/tc/schein/html
Vredenburgh, D., & Brender, Y. (1998). The hierarchical abuse of power in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1337ΓÇô1347.
Washington, R. R. (2007). Empirical relationships between theories of servant, transformational, and transactional leadership. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1ΓÇô6. Retrieved December 13, 2007, from Business Source Complete database.
Williams, M. E. (2001). Theory-driven comparative analysis: Dead on the gurney or lost in the shuffle? Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 112ΓÇô 131.
Withers, M. J. (2002). Generation X and Baby Boomer staff nursesΓÇÖ job satisfaction..
Yeaton, K. (2008, April). Recruiting and managing the ΓÇÿwhy?ΓÇÖ generation: Generation Y. The CPA Journal, 78(4), 68-72.
Zohar, D. (1997). Rewiring the corporate brain: Using the new science to rethink how we structure and lead organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).